Crop sensor vs full frame canon macro8/30/2023 ![]() Both are outstanding lenses.ĦD Mark II - EF 17-40 f4 L - EF 100mm f2.8 L IS Macro - EF 70-200 f4 L IS w/1. I still have the 60mm, but I think my brother is going to get it from me. I started with the 60mm, then jumped to the 100mm L IS, mostly for the IS. Then you would have to back away and reduce magnification to fit it in the frame, while a full frame could make use of full magnification. It could even be a disadvantage if the subject is larger than your crop sensor. Magnification is a factor of the lens, not the sensor when you are talking about macro. The image on the sensor is still 1:1 (or life size) at the minimum focus distance. ![]() If you buy the lens primarily for doing macro, larger magnification is a pure advantage. So 100mm macro lens is effectively 1.6:1 lens on a crop camera. MFD is the same on both FF and crop cameras. Stack Exchange network consists of 183 Q&A communities including Stack Overflow, the largest, most trusted online community for developers to learn, share their knowledge, and build their careers. 35mm full-frame Full-frame is also known as 35mm full-frame, and it originates from the 35mm film is used in film cameras. Is it really that much different picture quality th. The only difference when using a FF macro lens on a crop is that you get 1.6x higher magnification, at the same distance. Then came the digital revolution and cropped sensor cameras made these lenses really impressive as we gained relative depth of field and greater reproduction. Full-frame: 36 x 24mm APS-C (Canon): 22.3 x 14.8mm. I dont think I would be shooting much bugs as I dont get to see many of them anyway I guess I will be doing flower shots, item shots, and mainly water dripping from leaves/flower shots. Thank you guys! Oh well, its not so easy after all. My bottom line: if you think you are going to do bugs, I would start with the 100mm. ![]() If you end up using extension tubes for more magnification (don't do this to start), you will get more magnification with the shorter focal length.īTW, the photo in my avatar, of a small spider exploring my fingernail, was shot with the 60mm and 68mm of extension (the full set of Kenko tubes), for a magnification somewhat over 2:1. When I do tripod-mounted shots of flowers, I more often use the 60 because the shorter working distance can be an advantage when you are working on a table top. ![]() I have a crop sensor camera and both the 100mm L and the EF-S 60mm. If you are going to do indoor work on a tripod, it's not so obvious. (You will still be VERY close if you want minimum focusing distance). if you are going to chase bugs, 100mm is a nice length because it does let you say a little farther away than a 60mm. The ideal focal length depends on what you are going to shoot. In fact, the area of an APS-C sensor is about 1.6 times the area of a micro four thirds sensor, albeit with an aspect ratio of 3:2 for APS-C rather than 4:3 for micro four thirds. Yes to both questions, for that lens (and most macro lenses). As you can see, the difference between APS-C and micro four thirds is a bit less than the difference between full frame an APS-C. So if I focus on objects further than that. Do you get 1:1 only if you are in the minimum focussing distance? ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply.AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |